books and lens flareThe contemporary library is in the middle of a transformation. With efforts to embrace new forms of media pushing to redefine the role of the library in the community, it is still too soon to declare the traditional library dead as CNN did. The library has always been a place for the maintenance of information resources and media for the community it serves. The migration of much information to digital resources has forced libraries to provide ways to accommodate these resources. Often these changes are very visually evident as libraries adapt their layouts to physically accommodate the growing importance of digital resources.

There are examples of some libraries moving entirely away from books. It will still be a long time until it will be reasonable though for all or even most libraries to abandon books. The digitized book is just now starting to be taken seriously as a technology moving towards the mainstream. The first mp3 codec was released in 1994, but it wasn’t until 2003 that the iTunes store opened. It took a few years more for commercial digital audio distribution to become the dominant retail channel for distributing audio. Even though the internet was born as and still remains primarily a textual medium, a viable digital alternative that can completely supplant the book for both consumers and scholars. One of the smallest of the difficulties to converting the printed corpus into machine readable formats may be the actual process technologically of converting text printed text to digital formats.

The foremost issue that will slow the replacement of the printed volume will be the copyrights attached to various books, whether they are in print or not. Between the variety and quantity of commercial presses and their imprints to the number of university and other academic presses hunting down and acquiring distribution rights for every book that may hold some value to any possible inquiry of value is Herculean and potentially impossible task. On top of this is the problem of making the text of a particular work available in formats that allow for using the book across a variety of reading devices is still another challenge. The legal issues surrounding Google Book Search are just now starting to gradually wind down will larger stakeholders settling claims, but the legal skirmishes attached to old yet copyrighted works still likely continue for quite a while.

Format, quality, and access are going to continue to be foundational reasons for maintaining physical books in libraries. The circulation of books to individuals as a free service is a library function yet to be replaced with a technological alternative that is operating on a widespread basis. This singular problem will likely keep books on the shelves of just about every major academic library (or library system for Universities that host many library locations for different population) and many community libraries. Community libraries may pare down their collections as they have often done to continue to keep their collections fresh while constrained by space limitation, but the library book sale has long been a tradition in many communities. What is new and will likely remain rare are book purges as undertaken a few years ago by the San Francisco library’s main branch when they dumped roughly 100,000 books. Back in 2004 Newsweek contrasted this against the design of the new Seattle library which preserved its collection. The fate of the print academic journal is a question that really does merit treatment on its own.

So as the resources of the library shift and libraries shift priorities in filling their roles in the communities they serve, the traditional library is far from dead. This may be a renaissance for the Librarian, information specialist, as they serve to guide patrons inundated with information from a variety of media to find quality material to address the patron’s curiosity or their problems. In an era often dubbed the information age the library and librarian may now be more valuable than ever.