Tortuous Nonsense

In a time where roughly one out of ten people in the United States actively seeking work don’t have it the ridiculous lawsuit has taken a new form.  If you have failed to find employment three months after graduating college this year, bringing a lawsuit against your alma mater is not likely to help with the job search.  Without having some form of employment lined up from a previous internship with a company, three months isn’t a time frame in which it would be abnormal to be still looking for a job in a better economy.  Even six months wouldn’t be that unusual.  A lot of schools even advertise their job placement rates based on how many graduates find work in their field within two years of graduation.  Receiving an education is only one part of getting ready for a particular career, and applying for jobs is only part of getting a job.  The other part is being the best applicant to fill a particular opening, provided that there is an opening to fill.  With less jobs in the economy there is a much larger pool of candidates to compete with for the few available.  I don’t know of a single school that offers a tuition refund based on increased competition for jobs due to a down economy or rising unemployment.  The way endowments drop for most schools during an economic slowdown I don’t imagine many schools would be in a position to honor such guarantees even if they were offered.  The problem with the graduate’s complaint is an assumption of a specific failing on the part of their school while the problem is a larger failing of many factors outside of influence of the school.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Tortuous Nonsense

  1. pun-gent says:

    I think everyone should now file a small claims suit against Miss Thompson. On the grounds that her exhibition of such *STUPIDITY* is creating undue stress!

  2. Dave says:

    You have to love this!
    4.0 students get preferential treatment? Maybe because they worked hard and proved that they're highly motivated – an employer would rightly hire those over a 2.7 GPA!

    2.7, regular attendance, probably just as mediocre in every other way. Yawn. Hey employers! She's entitled to that job. How unenlightened of you – you hired the 4.0 GPA student instead of her!

    We can only hope that this is immediately thrown out of court. Of course, in this upside-down country with the drunken sailors in DC abusing YOUR credit card (and having a plan to NOT EVER pay it), it's no surprise that people like Trina think they deserve a job. In fact, Obama probably is planning to take YOUR money and give it to Trina, who was "oh so wrongfully" deprived of that job she deserves. Hey, maybe they'll give her a medical degree!

  3. Charles says:

    Note she also has a 2.7 GPA and "good attendance." Not exactly a rock star pupil either, and incredibility idiotic for filing the suit. $70,000 isn't enough to live on for the next 40 years, but good luck finding an employer willing to hiring someone who goes to court at the drop of a hat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>